page view

Thursday, January 24, 2013

Learning English in English

Aladdin Group




  • Group logo



The Reason that we choose Aladdin as our group name is that the lamp of Aladdin is only a piece of furniture till one day a pair of hands helping it to release the omnipotent spirit. Give yourself a chance to work with others, which can bring you a surprising outcome that you never imagined before

  • content

Creativity is a cognitive and thinking skill or process. It seeks to understand the thinking process of creative thought (Sternberg & Lubart, 1999). Any learning which involves understanding and new awareness, is based on allowing the learner to go beyond notional acquisition, and focuses on thinking skills.

Actually, creativity and innovation are closely linked. As a teacher, using innovative teaching means to let students learn independent thinking skills is more important than just learning knowledge, which means the process that leading to creative learning the implementation of new methods, tools and contents which could benefit learners and their creative potential.
We believe that learning is not to control students, but to develop them; not remember theory, but go into the life; not implant knowledge, but learn to create; not remember others’ thinking, but have your own thinking. Creative thinking is the true learning, is the core of the study. Therefore, in our new curricular, in order to achieve this teaching philosophy, we combine learning knowledge and learning creativity, through understanding the topic which is close to life, group discussion, in-class presentation, self-study, movie script creating and other ways to improve students’ creativity ability and thinking skills, which will be explained in detail in the following paragraph.



  • Team consideration of creativity teaching and assessing environment in education domain

Creativity teaching in education domain is usually considered as difficult for teachers because 2 tough contradictions are interrupting their way. First one is the implicit theories of creativity in education; second one is the poor environment for creativity teaching and assessing.

Accompany with years of education experiences and stories of eminent people, teachers gradually reached a series of implicit theories on what kind of students could be creative which differ from the ones carried by researchers significantly. For instance, one implicit theory suggests that only pure talent people in arts domain can make creativity happen; however, research shows that people from any disciplines with learnt skills are possible of coming up with creative ideas (Sharp 2004). In addition to that, numbers of research also find the relevance between creativity and knowledge-acquisition while implicit theory do not see any necessary to connect those two things (Boden 2001).

In terms of poor environment, there are basically 2 main problems in this field. To begin with, teachers have trouble with the balance between different areas. Education do not only serve the need of developing students but also responsible to deliver stakeholders’ expectation. It means that teachers need to spend more time to finish teaching required knowledge and give up time for discussion and idea sharing activities which benefit creative thinking skills a lot. Even though some teachers are encouraged to stimulate students’ creativity in their classes, teachers themselves are not creative at all to design any creative teaching methods to motivate students’ creative thinking skills. Because the lack of training of teaching creativity resulted ineffective class activities teachers used.




  • Theoretical base of the English program redesign


As what has been analyzed above, our team decide to design an English teaching program for students in Hong Kong Universities to both teach and assess their creativity. Instead of expecting eminent students with brilliant creativity, this program aims at cultivate LCC (Little c Creativity), which could be seen as behavior and mental attitude, or as the ability to find new and effective solutions to everyday problems, among students (in Craft, Jeffery, & Leibling, 2001).

In contrast to traditional English teaching that judge a student’s mark on the behalf of their test result first, followed with their listening and speaking skills, in this newly designed program, both teachers and students should recognize the process of learning is more important than the product of learning. Therefore, we would capitalize on in class activities during the whole program to nurture students’ creative thinking skills and evaluate their performance continuously.

According to strategies Woods and Jeffery discovered in curriculum delivery, practitioners (teachers) could transfer knowledge in a creative way by: sharing and creating knowledge; speculating on a given topic; sharing puzzlement and so forth. Our team would make best use of these theories as our program design guidelines. We firmly build two class activities that run through the whole program to provide both teachers and students opportunities for creativity teaching and learning.

  • Activities both creativity itself and teaching for creativity

During the whole semester, each student is required to hand in a 1 page reading report once a month. Reading resources are not limited to one specific category, such as novels, newspapers or magazines are all counted. Students need to raise their own opinion of the materials they read in a short and concise style since the report is 1 page only. At the end class of each month, teachers will select 5 students randomly to present their works with the whole class with Q & A session. Students who presented can get an extra mark as bonus to stimulate their motivation. Teachers will also give comments of each selected report. This activity matches Hong Kong students’ English background. They can write and read English well because of teaching in English model of the city; however, they lack experiences expressing their thought in English. Staring from writing their thought out with limited words can exercise their precise application of the language. What’s more, report presentation is a brain-storming time for students to share and creating knowledge in public. Last but not least, students can also benefit from reading which is very effective to learn local expression and vocabulary.

Besides the activity mentioned above, the whole series of classes will be divided in to different topics, including hot political issues, history, entertainment, nature, animal protection etc. In the syllabus, teachers provide topic related movies which requires students to watch after classes. In the middle of the semester, each group of students should choose one of the movies to do the project. The project is to redesign movie plot with a hard copy of movie script and a team play last no more than 15 minutes. In addition to that, each group should explain their consideration of plot redesign. There will be one more chance to do this at the end of the whole semester for students to improve their performance based on the first experience. Teachers should address the purpose of this activity is to making students the centric of the class and they should be responsible for their own learning. And teachers would offer informal judgment as references. Plot redesign by students can trigger their creative thinking skills and connect knowledge learnt in lessons. Focusing on subtitles during the script writing is a process of knowledge accumulating which can reinforce memory. As the article mentioned in the beginning, knowledge and creativity are interdependent.

Assessment of the redesigned program
Creativity has to be valued by teachers throughout the whole educational process, from informal judgment to written assignments. Reading report and script redesign penetrates during the whole semester, teachers got opportunities to observe students behavior and performance in the class and adjust the plans to match their needs. This creative designed program could enhance students’ motivation in English learning since they were already tired of traditional listening only model in their high school. It is challenging for them to speak out their thoughts appropriately and precisely but in-class discussion and report writing before presentation and drama play can ease their nervousness and build confidence. 


  • Team dynamics and situations that helpful or not helpful in developing Curriculum

There are two factor can help us come up with a creative English class that teaches English as a second language to University Students in Hong Kong.




Team Dynamics, from the definition of BusinessDictory.com, it means some unseen force that affect the behavior relationship among Team members, and Team Dynamics can strongly influence how a team reacts, behaves or performs, it also have a direct influence of the productivity of the task.
These forces might include Personality styles, Team Roles, Office layout, Tools and technology, Organizational culture and Processes/methodologies/procedures.

Base the theory of MTR-i™ team dynamics, it based on the roles that people play, and the resultant forces created by the interaction between team members.

Our team is a diversity team, and each of our team members has different learning area. Rena learned the urban planning in her university life, a good Urban Planner need to clearly understand the history of the urban and it also need good design & drawing skill. It makes Rena be a person who use rational and logicality thinking to solve problems in her work and life. Jewel took English as her major in her university study, she can speak a fluency American English. And she had been an English teacher in mainland China before she took the master courses in City University of Hong Kong, so she had some experience of teaching English, and she did not use the“Duck-stuffing” type of teaching to teach English, she used some creatively method to teach English. Jason took his bachelor degree at Hong Kong Baptist University before he took master degree at City University. So he has a understanding of Hong Kong Society, and his bachelor major is Human Resources Management, in a word, HRM is a subject which is put the suitable people at the suitable position, it need to have strong communication skill and basic psychology knowledge, then, it can analysis the character of each person and put them at the suitable place.

And our team wants to design a creatively English course for Hong Kong locals, and the character of our team is innovating. It can help us develop an innovative curriculum,


An innovative team can use their imagination to create different, unique and new perspectives and ideas. We observe the society around us, then use our imaginations to think what we have observed from the different perspective, and design a new ideas and insights, or using a new way to express the old ideas and perspectives. Innovating often use radical solutions to problems at the most time, it is a long term vision and it maybe a crazy ideas.

Innovative thinking is a double-edged sword, sometimes it were not helpful in developing an innovative curriculum. We focus on creativity, it might lead to ideas and perceptive that is too radical, which seem by others. Because we need to create different ideas or perspective, it would cause us to pursue impractical or unrealistic ideas. At the most time, creativity ideas is unique, it might lack alternative perspectives.



According to an Education Commission report in 1994, the portion of the population claiming to understand English rose from 44% in 1983 to 70% in 1993. Census data showed that the proportion of the population that could speak English, either as a first or second language, rose from 38.1% in 1996 to 43% in 2001 and 44.7% in 2006.

Hong Kong is an international city which as a bridge connects the eastern and western country. During the British colonial era, English was the sole official language of Hong Kong until 1974. After the 1997, Cantonese and English are both official languages of Hong Kong under the Hong Kong Basic Law and the Official Languages Ordinance. And the economics of Hong Kong based on Financial and service industry, all the university in Hong Kong use the English as the teach medium. So when our team designs the creativity curriculum, we can pay more attention to teach knowledge that require creative problem solving skills, innovative initiatives, and collaborative interactions with diverse others. Instead of grammar, or vocabulary, etc.




Besides, there are another reason would influence us design an innovative curriculum. Every university has policy and regulation, and school would set a series of requirement for professor, at the same time, school want English curriculum which is more creativity than traditional one, it is hard to deigning. Because at the most time, creativity is thinking a new thing, innovation is doing a new thing, and it is hard to understand by others. More rules and regulations restrict the imagination of the team.




  • What the parents concern about?-----If the teacher spend more time on class activities, will my children really acquire knowledge?

Actually, most of the parents are the advocates of tradition. Because the traditional teaching mode results can be expected, whether seeing other children have achieved good results, or their own child also has significant improvement in previous study, they are willing to believe that this teaching method, students can learn well and have a bright future. Therefore, the primary thing what most of the Hong Kong parents worry about is if their children are really into things, which means whether the students can acquire English knowledge and utilize it well under this teaching innovation, especially finding a  decent job after graduation  Parents always think more of grades and visible results.


















In fact, students in high school are just like test taking machines. They learn by rote and the learning motivation is almost for the grades. However, answering questions well does not mean they can digest the knowledge and apply it to other situation well. Some students who can get high marks lack of creative thinking skills and practical application ability, that is, expressing their own thoughts accurately. Additionally, since they have done lots of English exercise and tests in high school, passed quite difficult exam –A level, and entered the university which has a relatively free environment, it is inevitably for them to slack off. With less exam pressure, many students are not willing to learn English seriously like before. To meet the parents’ requirements, letting students learn English and use it well, the traditional teaching methods are of no help to solve this problem. What we need to do is to change their thinking habits, cultivating their creativity and let them be on their own initiative to learn.


  • Enterprises pay more attention to the applicants’ ideas and creativity ability.

Due to the rapid development of Hong Kong, when enterprises select employees, it is no longer for them to solely look at graduates’ background and grades, but paying more attention to whether the applicant has his own thoughts and creativity that can bring fresh strength for the company. Look at what the world’s top 500 enterprise values- 8 essential elements in Nestle: English ability, adaptability and agility, attitude, creativity, enthusiasm, loyalty, communication skills, independent, team work skills and leadership skills; for Johnson, thinking is the first evaluation factor. Thus, as mentioned above, thinking process is important than learning product. Our curricular is exactly based on the teaching philosophy of thinking and creativity.




English ability, adaptability and agility, attitude, creativity, enthusiasm, loyalty, communication skills, independent, team work skills and leadership skills




Thinking is the first evaluation factor 




  • Consolidating knowledge in the creation process of thinking 


The innovation we proposed is to let the class become lively and interesting, more than teaching vocabulary, grammar, pronunciation, etc. The teacher will choose one topic a class to guide the students to discuss, which involving those contents of hot debates that Americans or the British are interested in. Through this way can help the students to have a certain understanding about foreign society and humanity. After all, if one wants to speak English well, he must know the English national historical and cultural background. Meanwhile, in the basis of understanding, taking one-on-one dialogue with the teacher can enhance their language ability and strain capacity. Such curricular may largely stimulate students’ innovative and creative thinking. Certainly, combined with parents’ concern, we add movie script creation and drama play to improve students’ practical application ability. As the process unfolds, the student becomes aware of the potential for a creative approach in al aspects of the development of an identity (Kiely, 1998). At the same time, they also learned the corresponding knowledge, including the writing, listing, speaking and thinking in English skills. Of the most importance, their creativity abilities are nurtured.

There is one more thing to be added. This new curricular is open to above grade two, aiming to give freshman time to adapt different study in university so that it can eliminate inelasticity, which in another concern one those parents mentioned.


  • Reference

  1. Margaret C. Kiely, 1998, “A piece of good news”: Teaching as a creative process, 30-38.
  2. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I., 1999. The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity: 3-15. 
  3. C.K. Lau, 2009. HONG KONG’S ENGLISH TEACHING CONUNDRUM. Hong Kong Journal. According to http://www.hkjournal.org/archive/2009_summer/3.htm
  4. Team Dynamics, Team Technology website. According to http://www.teamtechnology.co.uk/team-dynamics.html
  5.  Sharp, C. (2004). Developing Young Children's Creativity: what can we learn from research?Topic, 32, 5-12.
  6. Boden, M. (2001). Creativity and Knowledge. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 95-102). London: Continuum.
  7. Craft, A., Jeffrey, B., & Leibling, M. (2001). Creativity in education. London: Continuum.